‘The Dark Knight’ Nolan wizard, of course.
A film, passing by which means losing weight, ton, ocean of positive emotions.

"Dark Knight", who triumphantly rushed around the world at one time, collecting an exorbitant amount of money and, of course, more important, human, pure, sincere love, can be considered one of the most successful commercial films.
Under the budget c 185 million Presidents (already inspires) the film gathered in the world about billion USA dollars.
I will not torment further numbers;Believe the word: it was cooler only "Titanic" And "Avatar".

Christopher Nolan.Christian Bale.Hit Ledger. Aaron Eckhart.Michael Kane.Gary Oldman.Morgan Freeman.Maggie Gillenhae. 2008.

IN Gotham, As we know from the finals of the first part of this trilogy, an extremely dangerous psychopath has appeared, calling itself Joker.
He wears makeup on his face.
Apparently for intimidation.
Or hostility from others. At first glance and forever, so to speak.
He has serious scars on his face.
Both are approximately the same in size and meaning that carry.
Because of them, the Joker always smiles ..
Damn love knives and explosions.
Turning his cunning business for the sake of pleasure, Joker could not help but attract close attention Batman.
Attracted so much that Batman began to doubt the advisability of his existence.
Almost lowered his hands.
The hero is outlawed.
Why, when there is an authorized hero – district prosecutor Harvey Dent?
Who can bring much more benefit to Gotham, not hiding his face, working day and night – at once than Batman, who has to lurk in the night.

The “dark knight” (in fact, like the first part) stands out by the fact that this is not a movie shot only to be shot;In other words, not in order to cut a lot of dough, making little effort only on the general visualization and popularity of the universe.
It would seem: it was possible to arrange for all two hours thirty minutes a non-stop action with explosions, chases, fights, shootings, bloodshed and (necessarily!) tears and a bright love line.
This is all, you should not worry, but it is competently, very competently diluted by morality. Thoughts. Doubts. Feelings. Elections.
You cannot call the "Dark Knight" a "superficial" film that only gives us visualization and a simple heroic stamped plot.
In such cases, I usually say: the film has a "second bottom".
Although whether the second.

The film just tears out the notorious moral issues from the inside.
There is no main, dominant question, which means that everyone to the question “What is the film about?»Will put forward its version, which will surely differ from the version of any other person.
And this is a film in Batman’s universe – a man who became a superhero not because he suddenly gained certain inhuman abilities, but because he could not put up with the state of affairs.
In principle, a raid of deep morality is obliged to be, but, you yourself understand, 2008, blockbuster, 185 “lemons” of the budget, and this is how to play with the fire of boltology, thoughts and other things a little dangerous.
Although … Wasn’t the Batmenovsky “beginning” by an experiment on the topic “Can people perceive a serious movie about fictional heroes on the screen?"?
As it turned out, how.

Such deafening There would probably be no success with the “knight” (sorry for my inappropriate psychic manners), if not for Hit Ledger.
This is the person about whom I must say.
And say a lot.
Hit Ledger as a Joker is incomparable.
And these are not emotions that caused a night review of the film.
If you try to abstract as much as possible from feelings and try soberly, from the point of view of “integrity”, the conviction of the image to evaluate the acting, then this opinion will still be obtained.
It’s not about makeup, which was applied before filming for about an hour.
Sitting for an hour while you smear your face is difficult, believe me to know.
It’s not about the crown and for some reason by many beloved phrase ‘Who so serious?b.
The fact is that the hit Leder Not starred in the "Dark Knight".
It was a real joker – the way he, in my opinion, should be.
Dangerous sociopath Without brake pedal.
Completely unrelenting a sense of sympathy.
It’s no secret that a whole month has lived in a hotel room alone, working on the role.
Above movements, facial expressions, intonations.
It was inspired by comics, short stories.
On the set Michael Kane (Alfred)In one episode I even forgot from fear of the Joker of the word.
Perhaps the death of a hit is associated with the role of Joker.
Maybe not connected.
I heard many different versions myself at one time.
But the contribution that Ledger left in the cinema (yes, in it, and not in a single film), fully deserves the applause of standing.
And minutes of silence.
Again.

Of course, against the backdrop of the genius of the Ledger, the rest can be scolded, but whether it is necessary?
The old, “starting” heroes carefully transferred their characters to the sequel, new heroes do not spoil the paintings, well, and … what else … for each separately? Back, no.
A couple of words about Christian Baile (he is not yet tired of my speeches?).
Alas, he also carefully transferred his image from the "beginning".
Chic Wayne, not the best Batman.
Although the latter has become better due to the increase in the quality of the film and a small decrease in unnecessary facial crickets.
I don’t know what Nolan thought when he put him on the role.
I have nothing against Baile-actor, Baile-man, Baile male, but he clearly does not fit this role. Texture and, as it turned out, the game.
And even if the “Dark Knight”, unlike the first film, smoothed the ambiguous impressions of Batman, is still inclined to believe that Bale’s assertion of Batman is the main mistake of both films.
Sorry, Christian.

On the visual side of the film is full order.
The action scenes are made correctly: the camera, if shaking, does it barely noticeable, statics take good angles.
Visually Gotham is not much different from the same New York or Chicago
Nolan made a bet for a real, not phantasmagoric world for the second time.
He simply added a new city to the world map, which is actually not, but which is no less real in his forms than the rest.
A well -known game world was responsible for musical accompaniment Hans Zimmer And James Newton Howard.
If you have not missed the very beginning of my post, then you will understand how perfectly they made them an audio-component film.
"Localization" of the film is surprisingly good. Of course, to the original in general and to the Joker in particular, she is far away, but at least it can be listened. And yes, a huge plus to our compatriots for getting rid of this terrible, hoarse, low voice of Batman. In the original, he is present and terrible, whatever one may say. Nolan-Nlan, what is happening with your Batman.
In terms of duration, it is worth saying that although the movie is 2:30, it flies in the sensations instantly, and after the finale the only thought (except "Kruguutoooo. ") lies in the desire to get more and more.
But it will be in 2012, In the meantime, we stock up on patience.

‘The Dark Knight’ – Jinx Casino UK a film that will certainly become a legend.
And after many, many years classic.
Cinema classics in any universe.
And we witnessed the birth of this future classics.

– Pursue me!
Accuse me!
To hunt me … because it should be so.
Because sometimes the truth is not good enough. P
Oreo people deserve more.
Sometimes people deserve that their faith is rewarded.

(There was a Flash player, but since 2020, Flash has not been supported by browsers)

The best comments

Mental torment, like dialogs, is fully present. Another thing is that the Joker obscures the whole thing with his figure.

The action scenes are made correctly: the camera, if shaking, does it barely noticeable, statics take good angles.

There is one jump at Nolan-for some reason he decided that if you remove music from some action scenes, it will be much more intense. And in TR and at the beginning (with DICAPRIO) this fenka was. And just tangibly made me understand how a gramone sound is needed for a fight. Otherwise all tension, on the contrary, is blown away like a ball.

I’m angry, everyone knows this, and therefore I will make my A Little Bit Critics.
Joker Okhuen*n. All this is recognized and confirmed. Perhaps the most vivid image in the history of cinema. But you allowed yourself to designate the image revealed by the Joker – classic. This is not entirely true, a real jocker is rather a clown, and not a cheerful psycho-sociopath, which does not cost nothing to burn half a billion dollars and a person with them so at ease. In the “Dark Knight”, the retreat of Ledger is just seen from the very authentic “Nicholas” Joker – for the character of the hit is much more expressive, incontinent, funny?
I could keep silent about the technical side, for everyone knows who Nolan is, and the analysis of the film is not in your style (this is inherent only to us – wretched).
There was no need to talk about localization either. I watched both Batmans Conspicuous number of times and the localization is as accurate as possible, even the Joker is not so annoying. But it is not the point, in this you agree, the main thing that you did not take into account, that in the original film Batman was a deaf, mechanical voice-he did for a suit to make his voice uncertain.
Little about Ledger, unfair about Bale. He was simply not given replicas in this part and he did not talk so much, but it was not true that he was fucking*N in the first part. Batman is one of the most successful Batmen, as it refers to the class of actors, which can do everything with him. And he would have been given to play, but, it seems to me, Nolan did this for contrast, as in his beloved “Vorona”, that is, an incredibly eccentric joker and a rather dry and restrained Batman.
He did not mention Maggie Jillenhah and Eckhart at all, although they also played grandiose. He did not say about awesome quotes, about awesome dialogs – if I had not watched the film, I would not understand why he was so grandiose.

And, in general, the review is good, although he expected more. The film Okhuen*n and one of the best that I have ever watched. About 15 times he already looked at a heap of different languages, completely translated the script, fell in love with Nolan’s films and, waiting for the best film in the world, was completely devastated after the “Beginning”. Do not understand the wrong thing, the “beginning” is awesome, but if you compare it with the “dark knight”, then it looks rather boring. TR is one of the best films in history, of course.

But did not notice after all.

Well, I won’t argue about Bale, since how many people, so many opinions, and all this is subjective, when it comes to even an attempt to somehow characterize the actor in his role.
Of course, Bale does not spoil the film, no. Just … just like that.

About Batman’s voice seemed to say.

In general, I will take into account the jam. 🙂

I did not open at all. Yes, and Ladger, your mother, cool. They are both cool.
Joker, perhaps, is not quite a clown, but not a cheerful psycho-sociopath. Infa is 100%, because DC was seriously fond of four years.

Well, so I know that it is conceived.
I watched the "knight" twice tonight – in both voice acts.
And yet they did not give Fully This voice. Distant hints, not like in the first film.

Did not expect to meet such an opinion. 🙂
Well, how Wayne should open up? His motives are clear, goals, too, ways similarly.

I have no arguments, but still nollan works in this film.
Well, he was labor because of this film, he meant.

Don’t know. But I always adored his dialogs with Alfred, Robin, Superman or Terry Mack Guinness … They are not here. As there is no mental torment (well, almost no). This film is not about Batman, but about the Joker and some kind of chaos philosophy.

: DD
Ledgery more stately, respectable, or something. The game is so clown-clown. Cute clown. And to Ledger-Joker no sympathy.